Why Failed Predictions Don’t Matter

The UFOs were supposed to arrive around 4PM on December 17, 1954.  At least that’s what the Seekers, a Chicago-based cult group, were told by their leader through a decoded message.  The core belief of the Seekers was that the end of the world was near and that “spacemen” were coming to rescue them from this impending doom.    

But, as 4PM came and went, the spacemen never arrived. 

“What went wrong?” some of the members asked themselves.  The group was forced to rationalize the no-show. 

Initially, some members of the group suggested that their saviors from space never arrived because a few non-committed members were at the event.  This theory was not accepted by the group, so they kept discussing.

Finally, one of the group leaders declared that this had been a “practice run” to test their skills.  It was all a drill, and they all had passed magnificently.  This explanation was wholeheartedly embraced by all but one member of the group.  

However, over the course of the next week, three more rapture predictions were followed by three more failures and three more equally impressive rationalizations.

One such prediction never materialized because it was “another drill.”  Another failed because, as the leadership determined, the group’s deep dedication actually prevented the apocalypse from happening altogether.  This ingenious excuse changed the Seekers from failed prophets to the saviors of humanity in one fell swoop.  

And with each failed prediction, most of the group members stay committed with some of them even increasing the conviction of their beliefs.  Here is how one member explained their commitment to the group in When Prophecy Fails:

I’ve had to go a long way.  I’ve given up just about everything.  I’ve cut every tie.  I’ve burned every bridge.  I’ve turned my back on the world.  I can’t afford to doubt.  I have to believe.

The most amazing part of this story is that out of the 11 members of the Seekers, only two left the group following the string of incorrect predictions.  As the authors of When Prophecy Fails note:

It is reasonable to believe that dissonances created by unequivocal disconfirmations cannot be appreciably reduced unless one is in the constant presence of supporting members who can provide for one another the kind of social reality that will make the rationalization of disconfirmation acceptable.  

In other words, if you have a social support system, any such conflicting beliefs can be overcome with rationalizations.  This is evidenced by the fact that the two members who left the Seekers were the ones most isolated from the group.  

This brings me to my main point. 

It’s been a week since the long-awaited Bitcoin halving, and it appears that the massive price increase that was supposed to occur, never materialized.  Everyone who claimed that, “the Bitcoin halving isn’t priced in,” and that a drop in supply would lead to a big increase in price was clearly in the wrong.

However, I know that this unfortunate fact won’t matter to the diehard HODLers of Bitcoin anyway.  After all, it didn’t matter when these BTC price predictions failed to come to fruition:

And won’t matter when future ones fail either. 

It’s like this Jurassic Park meme on repeat:

In all seriousness, I used to think that making predictions that turned out embarrassingly wrong was bad for your image, but I’ve slowly begun to realize that most people, and especially devout followers, don’t really care. 

Why?  Because it is so easy to rationalize the failed predictions after the fact without causing any long-term reputational damage.  

For example, do you think that fans of Elon Musk cared when he got this COVID-19 prediction so gloriously wrong?



How do I know?  Because look at the level of engagement on this tweet response illustrating Elon’s massive error:

5 Retweets.  156 likes.     

In Elon’s world that basically rounds to zero.  The tweet might as well not exist.    

And when I’ve Tweeted similarly snarky replies towards individuals with equally wrong predictions, do you think this caused a mass exodus among their followers?  Not a chance.  

Just like the Seekers who remained committed in the midst of conflicting evidence, most people can overcome cognitive dissonance with the right amount of social support.  

You can say the same thing about Bitcoiners, permabulls (like myself), and, dare I say, value investors.  

After all, the prophets of AQR have come down from the mountain top yet again to tell us why now is a fantastic time to invest in value stocks.  This is only 7 months after they nudged us to “sin a little” in value’s direction.  So, does that imply that today I should be sinning a lot?  Should I become the Lucifer of value investing?

Despite my sardonic tone, I am not implying that value investors or Bitcoiners are apart of a cult, only that the same mental processes are at work within these groups as well.  Reducing cognitive dissonance is a hell of a drug.    

This explains why most followers won’t abandon the faith when their leaders get things wrong.  Because failed predictions never really mattered.  Just think of how many famous politicians and business leaders have made terrible predictions, yet are still revered.  

For example, Steve Jobs said that the Segway would be “bigger than the PC”, Steve Ballmer laughed at the unveiling of the iPhone, and Alan Greenspan called for double digit interest rates after 2007.  All of them were dead wrong, but, who cares?

In honor of this recent revelation, here are some predictions I have for the next decade:

  • The Dow will reach 60,000 before 2030.
  • Interest rates in the U.S. will go negative and will stay low for the foreseeable future.
  • Inflation in U.S. dollars will remain low for the foreseeable future.
  • Large gatherings (i.e. concerts, cruises, packed bars, etc.) will return even if we don’t find a COVID-19 vaccine.  
  • Working remotely will not replace most in-person offices.
  • There will be major overhauls in the tax system to reduce wealth inequality.

You may not agree with my predictions, but that’s okay.  Because if I’m wrong, I know you won’t really care, will you?

Nobody Cares About Your Failures

Despite my cynicism throughout this post, there is a silver lining in all this.  That silver lining is that people don’t care about your failed predictions because they don’t really care about your failures. 

This really hit home for me after reading a post from fellow blogger Four Pillar Freedom where he discussed what he has learned since he turned 18:

The world isn’t watching you as closely as you think. Take more chances. Your failures will mostly go unnoticed. And those who do notice rarely care.

And it’s so true.  We tend to forget that most people are so worried about their own problems that they don’t have time to think about your own faults.  This is why, earlier this year, I wrote:

When people don’t like your work, the response isn’t negativity, but silence.

But that silence is soon forgotten.  Let me prove it. 

How often do you think about my “less than stellar” blog posts? 

I already know your answer—never!  Because, why would you? 

You will forget one of my mediocre blog posts much more quickly than I ever could.  Well, guess what? 

The same thing is true for any of your failures as well.  They will mostly be forgotten by most people.  But if you are still skeptical, consider what one of the greatest athletes of all time had to say about failure:

I missed more than 9,000 shots in my career.  I’ve lost almost 300 games.  26 times I’ve been trusted to take the game winning shot, and missed.  I’ve failed over and over and over again in my life.  And that is why…I succeed.

-Michael Jordan

 Thank you for reading!

If you liked this post, consider signing up for my newsletter.
This is post 186. Any code I have related to this post can be found here with the same numbering: https://github.com/nmaggiulli/of-dollars-and-data

According to new research from Citi Private Bank, contemporary art returned 13.6% per year on average since 1995, compared to 8.9% for the S&P 500. Additionally, their study showed that, over the same period, art had almost no correlation to the stock market (0.01 correlation factor). But unless you have $10,000,000 to buy a Picasso yourself, the barriers to this asset class have been too high...until now.

Masterworks allows you to invest in paintings by artists like Basquiat and Warhol at a fraction of the entry price. I personally have invested in five different Masterworks offers so far and have enjoyed my experience. If you're interested in learning more, I've partnered with Masterworks to let Of Dollars and Data Readers skip the 15,000 person waitlist so you can begin investing in art today.*
*See disclaimer

(Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers click here.)

For disclosure information please visit: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/

OfDollarsAndData.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.