I got an unsolicited text from my cousin one week ago:
Your free stock is waiting for you! Join Robinhood and we’ll both get a stock like Apple, Ford, or Facebook for free. Sign up with my link.
Though I didn’t sign up (we’ll get back to that), this referral strategy seems to be working for Robinhood, who had 3 million new account openings in Q1 2020. This is nearly double the 1.58 million new account openings in Q1 2020 for Charles Schwab, TD Ameritrade, and ETrade combined.
With those three firms seeing a 106% increase in new account opening compared to last year, we seem to be entering a new age for retail investors with Robinhood at the helm.
Why is This Happening?
The best explanation I have read for the recent surge in retail investing comes from Marc Rubinstein, who sees it as a pivot from sports betting. He states:
The demographic of Robinhood’s customer base is similar to that of a sports bettor. Men aged 25-34 are the segment most likely to bet on sports on a regular basis. According to Deloitte 43% of North American men aged 25-34 who watch sports also bet on sports at least once per week, and that’s the same group that has flocked to Robinhood.
With the lack of live sports to bet on because of COVID, the pent up demand has turned to the stock market. And no individual has demonstrated this pivot from sports to stocks better than Dave Portnoy of Barstool Sports fame.
I started documenting Portnoy’s tiptoeing into stocks back in late March and in less than three months he has become one of the most influential people in all of financial Twitter. And what kind of stocks is Dave trading?
With some major airlines and cruise lines up over 90% in the last month compared to only an 8% gain for the S&P 500, the fear of missing out is very real:
Thanks to Robintrack, we can also see that Robinhood traders are piling into companies like Hertz, which recently filed for bankruptcy:
And electric vehicle maker Nikola, which currently has $0 in revenue and was briefly valued more than Ford:
While this behavior might seem dumb at first glance, it can be deemed rational if we assume that many of these Robinhood traders are just trying to make a quick buck before passing the bag to someone else. It’s like a game of musical chairs with stocks. Even Hertz is getting in on the action after a bankruptcy court ruled that it could issue $1 billion in “potentially worthless” equity to aid in its restructuring efforts.
Why Some Day Traders Will Always Beat You
Though it might seem like I am trying to make fun of Robinhood traders for their rash behavior, the fact remains that a good chunk of them are going to beat me (and you) in this market. And the last time I checked, money doesn’t care how it was earned, whether by luck or skill, or by indexing or day trading.
For example, David Perell, one of my best friends from Twitter, has outperformed me by about 15% a year over the past five years despite never studying investing. What’s his secret? While bored at his summer internship a few years ago, David decided that he should put half of his money in Facebook and half in Netflix because they seemed like good companies.
Fast forward to today and that allocation (which he never traded or rebalanced) has beaten the Russell 3000 by about 15% a year.
I ran 1,000 different simulations of random equal-weighted, 2-stock portfolios from the Russell 3000 and the probability that one of these portfolios would outperform the Russell 3000 by 15% annually over the past 5 years was less than 2%:
Less than 2% of portfolios above would have performed as well as David’s “I’m Bored” portfolio.
In fact, if we look at the distribution of the Russell 3000’s outperformance over the 2-stock portfolios, we can see that the Russell 3000 outperforms about two-thirds of the time:
The median outperformance for the index compared to the 2-stock portfolios was about 6% annually. However, this still implies that 33% of the time a random 2-stock portfolio will beat the index over a 5-year period.
And 33% isn’t 0%! So while I do enjoy poking fun at some of the antics of Robinhood traders, I also have to respect their willingness to defy the odds. Given that only about 1 in 20 day traders remain profitable in the long run, it is even more impressive when one of them succeeds, whether by luck or skill.
This is why I have to give props to David for beating me over the past five years, because, despite his luck, he still had to hold on for all these years. He still had to not sell even when it looked tempting. He still had to take the risk, and that earns my respect.
However, for every David, there is another trader that was not so fortunate. A recent analysis by Barclays said that the top picks of Robinhood traders went on to underperform the overall market, not the other way around. Therefore, we must ask: Is the renewed interest in the stock market good for the investment community?
Is Robinhood Good for Retail Investors?
Regardless of how you feel about Robinhood traders, Robinhood the company has done a lot to reduce trading commissions across the industry. My first blog post ever focused on the harmfulness of high fees over time, so any company that has helped to reduce fees for retail investors has done them a great service.
However, Robinhood is still a tool like any other tool. While you can use it to buy index funds, you can also use it to day trade on margin to disastrous consequences. Unfortunately, one member of the FinTwit community recently learned this after one of their family members took their own life as a result of Robinhood trading gone wrong.
As I have since learned, apparently this was an issue where the Robinhood interface was showing the young trader owing money that he didn’t actually owe. The stress from this misunderstanding, unfortunately, became too much for him to bear.
When I hear stories like this I debate whether the newfound interest in the stock market is a net positive for society. While some people will benefit from this experience and some will get harmless entertainment, I worry about those looking to get rich quick.
I worry because I know how many of them will fail (some miserably so) and how many of them won’t listen to reason. My cousin is the perfect example.
Remember that Robinhood text my cousin sent me last week? Well, it wasn’t the first one he sent this year. He sent me one back in February where he literally asked me “any recommendations on how to get rich quick?”
I told him that there was no such thing and tried pointing him in the right direction, but he wasn’t having it:
I seriously doubt that he did, in fact, “check it out.”
If there is anything I have learned from giving advice online over the last few years, it’s that some people don’t really want advice. Some people don’t want to be saved.
So, here’s some advice for you—don’t save them.
Thank you for reading!
If you liked this post, consider signing up for my newsletter.
This is post 190. Any code I have related to this post can be found here with the same numbering: https://github.com/nmaggiulli/of-dollars-and-data
According to new research from Citi Private Bank, contemporary art returned 13.6% per year on average since 1995, compared to 8.9% for the S&P 500. Additionally, their study showed that, over the same period, art had almost no correlation to the stock market (0.01 correlation factor). But unless you have $10,000,000 to buy a Picasso yourself, the barriers to this asset class have been too high...until now.
Masterworks allows you to invest in paintings by artists like Basquiat and Warhol at a fraction of the entry price. I personally have invested in five different Masterworks offers so far and have enjoyed my experience. If you're interested in learning more, I've partnered with Masterworks to let Of Dollars and Data Readers skip the 15,000 person waitlist so you can begin investing in art today.*
(Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers click here.)