Last week, David Swensen, the famed investment manager and Chief Investment Officer at Yale, died at the age of 67 after a long battle with cancer. Swensen, who was the pioneer behind the “Yale model”, revolutionized how endowments and institutions invest their money by emphasizing asset allocation and taking on more equity risk. His ideas have been used by tens of thousands of institutions to generate higher returns for millions of beneficiaries over the past few decades.
But Swensen’s body of work goes beyond institutional investing. It can be used by individual investors as well. For this reason, below I have summarized four investing lessons we can use from Swensen to improve our investment results.
1. Asset Allocation is Everything
When Swensen talks about investing, he suggests that there are three primary tools that we can use to affect our returns:
- Asset allocation
- Security selection
- Market timing
What asset classes you buy (asset allocation), which securities you buy within those asset classes (security selection), and when you buy them (market timing) are the three main levers that affect your long-run investment performance. Unfortunately, Swensen discovered that only one of these three tools actually mattered for most investors. As he explained during a guest lecture at Yale:
More than 90% of the variability in returns for institutional portfolios had to do with the asset allocation decision.
Swensen goes on to explain that this is true because security selection and market timing are negative sum games. While some investors will win when they select better stocks or time the market correctly, others will lose doing the same thing. So when you take into account the fees/commissions charged for doing so, the result is a negative sum game.
This is why most investors who try to pick stocks or time the market end up underperforming in the long run. While some people will outperform in these areas, most won’t. As a result, Swensen concluded that the primary driver of long-term performance is asset allocation. What assets you own (and in what proportions) are going to be the primary determinant of your investment results, all else equal.
Unfortunately, since we have no idea what future asset returns will look like, we can’t know what will be the optimal asset allocation going forward. Despite this, Swensen does provide some clarity on what kinds of assets you should own.
2. If You Want Growth, Increase Your Equity Exposure
Though future asset returns are unknowable, what we do know is that equities tend to outperform bonds, commodities, and cash in the long run. This is why Swensen recommends an increased exposure to equities for those with longer time horizons (i.e. institutions). And though you aren’t an institution, the logic still applies.
Swensen solves the asset allocation problem I mentioned in the prior section by looking at what would have worked throughout history. His conclusion suggests a larger allocation to equity (and equity like) investments from around the globe. Swensen provides one such allocation as an example in his book Unconventional Success: A Fundamental Approach to Personal Investment:
- 30% U.S. equity
- 15% Foreign developed equity
- 5% Emerging market equity
- 20% U.S. Real Estate (REIT)
- 15% U.S. Treasury Bonds
- 15% U.S. Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS)
What you will notice about this allocation is that it is only 30% U.S. stocks and 30% U.S. bonds, with the remaining 40% spread out across international stocks and U.S. real estate.
More importantly, though this portfolio only has half the allocation to U.S. stocks as a 60/40 U.S. stock/bond portfolio, it still has returned 8.6% per year over the last decade. While this isn’t as good as the 10.1% annual return of a 60/40 portfolio over the same time period, it’s impressive nonetheless.
Swensen’s argument for more equities (and other risk assets) in your portfolio heavily influenced my thinking on how individual investors should build wealth. This is why I have emphasized income-producing assets as the core building block of your portfolio. And while owning these assets can be riskier in the short run, as Swensen has pointed out, in the long run it’s one of the best ways to build wealth.
3. Diversification Works…in the Long Run
As global asset prices declined during the financial crisis of 2008, Swensen’s approach to investing was under attack. How could anyone hold so many volatile assets that could all fall at the same time? What was the point of diversification if it didn’t save you when you needed it most?
Swensen fought back against these criticisms by arguing that diversification across risk assets wasn’t meant to save you during these short periods of instability, but over the long-term. The example he provides is of the Japanese investor who had most or all of their net worth in Japanese equities in the late 1980s. This investor would have seen an over 50% decline in their holdings over the next few decades. However, if they had owned non-Japanese equities as well, they would have had a very different result.
It’s easy to forget this point when the S&P 500 has outperformed most other asset classes over the past decade. However, we only need to look to the 2000-2010 period to find a time when this wasn’t the case. Swensen’s reminder that diversification is good for us, even though it can fail in the short run, is one that many investors should take to heart.
4. Our Time Horizon Can Be Shorter Than We Think
Of all the lessons I learned from Swensen’s life, one of them is in stark contrast to his teachings. Though Swensen taught us to invest as if we would live forever, unfortunately, his own life was cut short. For a man of his wealth, status, and education level to die at 67 is a grim reminder that the future is promised to no one. Swensen’s belief that we should invest for the long run is a good one, but it doesn’t work forever. Sadly, our time horizon can be much shorter than we think.
If you want to learn more about Swensen’s approach to investing, I highly recommend this excellent talk he gave at Yale and his books Pioneering Portfolio Management and Unconventional Success. Thank you for reading!
If you liked this post, consider signing up for my newsletter.
This is post 241. Any code I have related to this post can be found here with the same numbering: https://github.com/nmaggiulli/of-dollars-and-data
According to new research from Citi Private Bank, contemporary art returned 13.6% per year on average since 1995, compared to 8.9% for the S&P 500. Additionally, their study showed that, over the same period, art had almost no correlation to the stock market (0.01 correlation factor). But unless you have $10,000,000 to buy a Picasso yourself, the barriers to this asset class have been too high...until now.
Masterworks allows you to invest in paintings by artists like Basquiat and Warhol at a fraction of the entry price. I personally have invested in five different Masterworks offers so far and have enjoyed my experience. If you're interested in learning more, I've partnered with Masterworks to let Of Dollars and Data Readers skip the 15,000 person waitlist so you can begin investing in art today.*
(Inclusion of such advertisements does not constitute or imply endorsement, sponsorship or recommendation thereof, or any affiliation therewith, by the Content Creator or by Ritholtz Wealth Management or any of its employees. For additional advertisement disclaimers click here.)