What’s Your Delta?

On Comparing Yourself to Others

Photo: Pixabay

I recently had dinner with my friend and ex-colleague John (not his real name) who now works at a large tech company.  During the course of our conversation John was compelled to tell me how well one of our other former colleagues Steve (also not his name) was doing:

Did you know that he is a multi-millionaire now?  And he owns three homes on the peninsula!

For context, over five years ago Steve went to go work at the same large tech company that John now works at.  While Steve got lots of equity when he joined (equity that has since appreciated considerably), John didn’t.  He joined a few years too late.

After John finished gloating over Steve’s success, I waited a moment and then replied, “And?”  John seemed a bit shocked by my response.  “Isn’t that crazy?” he said.  “Not really,” I continued, “Steve just got lucky.”

I understand why John felt a need to compare himself to Steve.  They both were of similar ages, had gone to similar schools, and had worked similar jobs, yet one of them was wildly more successful than the other.

Humans are social animals that subconsciously evaluate each other in status hierarchies.  Just like all other apes, we need to know where we stand relative to one another.  However, because this isn’t easy to do in the modern world, we use things like money, fame, and looks as proxies for status.

Unfortunately, monetary success can be largely a result of pure, dumb luck.  In this instance, I’m quite confident that Steve was lucky because, frankly, he wasn’t that good of an employee at our prior company.  While I would place John in the top 5% of all people I have ever worked with, I would place Steve in the bottom third.  Yet, one of them is a millionaire and the other isn’t.

Of course it is possible that Steve got better with time or that they just needed a different role, but I am skeptical.  I am skeptical because even if he did get better, there is no way that he got 10x better than my friend John, yet he earned 10x the rewards!

This is why you have to consider how much luck influenced someone’s life before you compare yourself to them.  Yes, I have heard that “you should never compare yourself to anyone else,” but that advice is hard to follow.  As I alluded to before, we just can’t help ourselves from performing social comparisons.  If we could, then companies like Instagram, Facebook, and Twitter wouldn’t exist in their current form.

The solution to this problem isn’t to “only compare yourself to your former self” either.  While this seems like good advice initially, it can be mentally harmful in the long run.  For example, consider someone who evaluates themselves based on their strength, beauty, or mental faculties.  How will these people feel when these attributes naturally decline with age?  Unless they find another way to evaluate themselves, it won’t be pretty.

This leaves you with a problem.  If you can’t compare yourself to others and you can’t compare yourself to your former self, what should you do?  You should compare yourself to where you would expect to be in the “average” state of the world.

For example, if we could re-run the universe 10,000 times while controlling for your genetics and general upbringing, in how many of these universes would you be better off than you are now?  In how many would you be worse off?  Have you had more than your fair share of luck?  Or did you have to struggle more than you would expect?

In the scientific community the Greek letter delta is commonly used to denote change.  The question you have to ask yourself is:

What’s your delta?

Is it positive or is it negative?  A positive delta means that you are better off than you would expect in the “average” state of the world, while a negative delta implies that you are worse off.  I ask this question because this is the only way I know of performing social comparisons while also trying to control for chance.

For example, if you were born into a farming community in India or China, it wouldn’t make sense to compare yourself to Bill Gates who was born to an upper middle class family in the wealthiest country on Earth.  However, comparing yourself to others in your farming community would be useful for understanding your expected life outcome.

You have to control for these starting conditions because, as I have demonstrated before, your starting state has huge implications for where you end up later in life.  Of course, controlling for initial conditions isn’t easy to do.  It’s hard to imagine how else your life could have turned out, but this doesn’t mean you shouldn’t try.

For example, what if we could re-run Warren Buffett’s life 10,000 times?  Would he be a billionaire in all of them?  Absolutely not.  However, Warren Buffett would be at least a multi-millionaire in many of these alternate realities.  Growing up in twentieth century America with his IQ, personality, and family upbringing would almost guarantee it.  The Warren Buffett we know got lucky, but that doesn’t take away from his genuine talent and efforts.  As I like to think about it:

Almost all millionaires are hard-working, but every billionaire is lucky.

This is why using “delta” is a better evaluation tool than directly comparing yourself to other people.  Because some of those other people are lottery winners, except, in their lottery, they never had to buy a ticket…

One Hand Out of Many

We all have a story we tell ourselves about ourselves.  You have one.  I have one.  And this story is what we use to judge our successes and our failures.  But it’s not the only story that could have been written, it’s just the one that was written.  If your story has more blessings than hardships, consider lending a hand to someone who wasn’t as fortunate.  The power of having a positive delta is being able to uplift those currently experiencing a negative delta.

And if you are one of those people who believes they have a negative delta, there is still time to change that.  Allison Schrager explained this well in An Economist Walks Into a Brothel when she described how Phil Hellmuth, a famous poker player, deals with periods of bad luck:

Hellmuth practices what behavioralists call broad framing: He never feels pressured to play a hand or fold, even if he’s down, because he reminds himself it’s just one hand out of many.

Hellmuth understands that even when he is down, there is still time to improve things.  That’s the beauty of life.  Most of us get more days.  Most of us get more chances to improve ourselves and the world around us.  This is just one hand out of many.  Thank you for reading!

➤ You can follow Of Dollars And Data via Twitter, Instagram, or my weekly newsletter (Sign up here!)

This is post 145. Any code I have related to this post can be found here with the same numbering: https://github.com/nmaggiulli/of-dollars-and-data

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Full Disclosure: Nothing on this site should ever be considered to be advice, research or an invitation to buy or sell any securities, please see my Terms & Conditions page for a full disclaimer.

OfDollarsAndData.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.

15 Responses

  1. Anonymous commented on Oct 08

    Very good advice if you’re older and feel that you haven’t quite arrived yet – so to speak :-). As you say, unless one is really old you’re still going to have some days ahead and if you’re older and wiser (hopefully), who knows what could still happen or be achieved!

  2. Anonymous commented on Oct 08

    So should I feel better about myself if I have a positive delta or a negative one? I personally don’t feel good if my success is due to luck. But i wouldn’t feel good either if I’m living an unlucky life either.

  3. Anonymous commented on Oct 08

    I think of luck as a “residual” effect that explains success/failure but most people take a lot of credit for success and blame others when they fail (human nature I guess). “Just one hand out of many” is a good mental model that can avoid this bias Thanks for sharing Nick!

  4. Anonymous commented on Oct 08

    Thank you, Nick. This is an interesting application of probabilistic thinking – one of the skills taught in the new field of Decision Education.

  5. Anonymous commented on Oct 08

    Happiness = Reality – Expectations.

  6. Anonymous commented on Oct 08

    Excellent. It wasn’t until I was around 40 that I figured out what you have laid out in the value of luck. I wouldn’t call it all luck but maybe luck plus chance. You parent may have had a choice of cities to relocate to, you had a choice of jobs offers to make, after a choice of schools to attend. How we all got here is a complicated set of circumstances, and much was beyond control or beyond advanced decision making.

    But hey, I know my Delta, it is epsilon–still working on the sign.

  7. Anonymous commented on Oct 10

    If John was so smart why didn’t he join that large tech company when Steve did? Life is not just doing well in school, going to the right parties and hoping that riches fall in your lap. Perhaps Steve realized his old employer was cheap, cut bait and moved on to a better opportunity. Of course, that takes guts and risk is involved. Characteristics that John may not possess.

    • Nick Maggiulli commented on Oct 10

      Why don’t you go tell that to the people who joined WeWork. It’s easy to rationalize skill after the fact. No one knew this tech company would do as well as it did (otherwise the stock price would have reflected this).

  8. Anonymous commented on Oct 11

    Great piece! Comparing yourself to average is healthy, but remembering those who are unlucky (not just financially) and that as Americans you are probably starting with a positive delta can also help with framing. Be thankful for what you have.

    (I do take issue with “most millionaires” being hard-working. Anecdotally I can come of with a long list of counterexamples. More generally, I’d be surprised if the proportion of hard-working millionaires is much larger than among the working population at large. We need to know the base rate)

  9. Anonymous commented on Oct 14

    Alternatively people could measure themselves against more meaningful issues; such as ethics, morals, societal contribution, skill development, life-balance, etc.
    Keeping score in purely monetary terms is embarrassingly puerile but very typical on the industry

  10. Anonymous commented on Oct 14

    Just wanted to tell you that I love your writing and look forward to every new article you write. Keep it going.

    …even if you started out with a positive delta, what you do with it is a show of character at least.

We have the right to delete inappropriate and unfriendly comments.