Has the Dust Settled Yet?

Imagine it is January 1, 2020 and you are talking with a friend who’s portfolio has been 100% cash since 2017. You ask them whether they want to buy some stocks and they reply that “prices are too elevated” and mumble something about the CAPE ratio.

Now fast-forward to late March 2020. Equity markets have experienced their fastest selloff ever with stocks down 30% (or more) off their highs across all the major indices.

You re-approach your friend asking whether it is now the right time to buy stocks. Despite being flush with greenbacks, your panicked friend responds, “Oh no. I am going to wait for the dust to settle.”

12 trading days later, the Dow is 26% above its March 23 lows, yet your friend remains in cash.

At this point, the question you really want to ask (but don’t) is:

Has the dust settled yet?


The unfortunate part of this story is that it isn’t imaginary. It actually happened to someone I know.

Nevertheless, it highlights some of the thoughts on lots of investors’ minds right now:

Is the end near?

Is the worst behind us?

Has the dust actually settled?

With the recent decline in new coronavirus hospitalizations in NY state and the 26% rally in the Dow from March 24 to April 8, it’s hard not to be optimistic at this point.

But before you bring out the champagne, let’s consider what the record of history can teach us about such unprecedented market rallies.

Since 1915, the Dow has had eight non-overlapping periods when it rose by 20% (or more) within the course of 12 trading sessions:

Dow with every 20% or greater 12-session increases highlighted

Besides our most recent rally, the other seven rallies occurred in the 1930s [technically one occurred in late 1929, sue me].

This means that a rally of this speed and magnitude is unheard of among today’s investors. Naturally, you might be wondering what comes next after such a sudden rise in markets.

Well, in the one year (i.e. 250 sessions) following a 20%+ rally, the market was up by 15% on average:

Dow over next 250 sessions following a 20% increase in price

Despite how bullish this may sound, the sample size of this analysis is only seven, with all seven of these post-rally periods occurring in the 1930s!

However, even when we lower the rally threshold from a 20%+ gain to a 15%+ gain over 12 sessions, our sample size only increases to 20:

Dow with every 15% or greater 12-session increases highlighted

And, once again, this data series is completely dominated by the 1930s, with only about one in five of these rallies occurring outside of this decade.

More importantly though, the average 1-year performance following 15%+ market increases is slightly worse than the average 1-year performance following 20%+ increases:

Dow over next 250 sessions following a 15% or greater increase in prices

And though the average result is positive, the chance of you being on the upper half of this chart is only slightly better than a coin flip.

But all of this performance analysis is based on a lump sum investment. What if we added money to the market over time after such a rally? Could dollar-cost averaging (DCA) help us in this situation?

Not really.

Even if you had put in $1 every trading day for one year (250 sessions) following any of these rallies, there is a 45% chance that your investment would be underwater by the end of the period:

DCA into Dow over next 250 sessions following a 15% or greater rise in prices

I don’t show you this chart in order to scare you, but to remind you that big rallies don’t mean that the coast is clear. At least not yet.

As William Bernstein said in a recent discussion with Ben Carlson:

One thing that we learned from market crisis whether it’s the early 1930s or the more recent global financial crisis is that big up days, 6%, 8%, or 10% up days (like in 2008 or 2009) that’s volatility. And volatility is volatility, and it’s bad.

And I completely agree. Large, sudden market gains can seem good now, but they only happen in markets brimming with uncertainty, markets that can turn south (again) on a dime.

It is this seesaw between fear and greed that makes me hesitant to be bullish right now.

Because while the Dow is 26% above its March 23, 2020 low, it is still 20% below its February 19, 2020 high. We aren’t back in Kansas yet, folks.

And when will we be?

I don’t know.

I understand how unsatisfying this answer is, but “I don’t know” is the most truthful response I can provide.

When I see something as bullish, I say so. When I see something as bearish, I say so.

Unfortunately, the data in this instance isn’t as clear cut, so “I don’t know” it is. Final answer.

But, one day the dust will settle for the market. And when it does, what might it look like?

I think it will look like nothing. Small, forgettable price movements. Behavior unlike last month. This would be the signal to look out for. This would be a return to normalcy.

Until then, our only hope is to analyze history for some semblance of tomorrow. As Marshall McLuhan once said:

We look at the present through a rear-view mirror. We march backwards into the future.

McLuhan’s car analogy is an apt one for the market as well.

Because, just like a car speeding away into the distance, remember that, by the time the dust settles, the car is long gone.

Thank you for reading!

If you liked this post, consider signing up for my newsletter.

This is post 177. Any code I have related to this post can be found here with the same numbering: https://github.com/nmaggiulli/of-dollars-and-data


This content, which contains security-related opinions and/or information, is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon in any manner as professional advice, or an endorsement of any practices, products or services. There can be no guarantees or assurances that the views expressed here will be applicable for any particular facts or circumstances, and should not be relied upon in any manner. You should consult your own advisers as to legal, business, tax, and other related matters concerning any investment.

The commentary in this “post” (including any related blog, podcasts, videos, and social media)  reflects the personal opinions, viewpoints, and analyses of the Ritholtz Wealth Management employees providing such comments, and should not be regarded the views of Ritholtz Wealth Management LLC. or its respective affiliates or as a description of advisory services provided by Ritholtz Wealth Management or performance returns of any Ritholtz Wealth Management Investments client.

References to any securities or digital assets, or performance data, are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute an investment recommendation or offer to provide investment advisory services. Charts and graphs provided within are for informational purposes solely and should not be relied upon when making any investment decision. Past performance is not indicative of future results. The content speaks only as of the date indicated. Any projections, estimates, forecasts, targets, prospects, and/or opinions expressed in these materials are subject to change without notice and may differ or be contrary to opinions expressed by others.

Please see disclosures here: https://ritholtzwealth.com/blog-disclosures/

OfDollarsAndData.com is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.